Duji Bai (Died) / Deleted Through Lrs. v. Gokul Singh
WPC/3028/2021 · 2026-09-24
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37515 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37515 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010191652013
2026:CGHC:41775
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3028 of 2021 1 - Duji Bai (Died) / Deleted Through Lrs. S/o As Per Honble Court
Order
Dated
11-06-2021. 1.1 - Sharda Banchhor W/o Ajay Banchhor Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Adhina, Salka, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 1.2 - Fulmati W/o Samaru Ram Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kesgawa, Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur),
Chhattisgarh 1.3 - Rajkumari W/o Sahat Ram Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Atori, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 1.4 - Dhanraj Cherwa S/o Late Anand Ram Cherwa Aged About 29 Years R/o Thangan Para, Ward No. 29, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
. .. Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Gokul Singh S/o Keshav Singh Aged About 65 Years R/o Pandeypura, Kenabandh, Ambikapur Civil And Revenue District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Surguja Division, Ambikapur Chhattisgarh., District
:
Surguja
(Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Surguja (Place
2 Ambikapur)., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Kabeer Kalwani on behalf of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondents No. 2 to 4/State : Mr. Hariom Rai, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 25/09/2026
1. On 05/05/2026, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Thereafter, again on 01/07/2026, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Today also when the matter was called up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. In such circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Harneet