IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202 CRA-S-2250-2026(O&M) Date of Decision:27.08.2026 VISHAL SHARMA AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana. *** RAMESH KUMARI, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 438 of the Cr.P.C) by the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail as the petitioner has been implicated in criminal case arising out of First Information Report as detailed hereinunder:- FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 80 07.03.2026 316(2), 85, 3(5) of BNS (erstwhile Sections 406, 498-A, 34 of IPC) (Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s)m 3(2) (Va) of SC/ST Act, 1989 added later on) Pundri, District Kaithal 2. Vide order dated 22.07.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioners were released on interim bail and were directed to join investigation. POOJA SAINI 2026.08.27 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRA-S-2250-2026(O&M) -2- 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Yashpal No. 310/KTL states that the petitioners have joined the investigation and they are not required for custodial interrogation. 4. In view of the said facts, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 22.07.2026 granting interim bail to the petitioners is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. 27.08.2026 (RAMESH KUMARI) pooja saini JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No POOJA SAINI 2026.08.27 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment