Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37486 (CHH)

BABULAL AGRAWAL v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

CRMP/2554/2026 · 2026-09-29

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010369192026 2026:CGHC:42482 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2554 of 2026 1 - Babulal Agrawal S/o Sh. R.K. Agrawal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Samarth, New Timber Market, Fafadi, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Central Bureau Of Investigation V.I.P. Road, Near Mana P.T.S. Road, Raipur, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (30.09.2026) 1. Heard on admission. 2. Admit. 3. The present CRMP has been filed seeking for restoration of CRR No. 374/2024 which got dismissed on account of peremptory order passed by this Court on 18.02.2026. 4. Vide order dated 18.02.2026 passed by this Court, three weeks' time was granted to learned counsel for the applicant to rectify the default(s), subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/-, failing SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.09.30 15:54:32 +0530 2 which the revision petition would stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the wife of the applicant was seriously ill and was undergoing continuous medical treatment. Consequently, the applicant could not pursue the matter further, resulting in dismissal of the revision petition for non-compliance with the aforesaid order. He further submits that the non-compliance with the order of this Court was neither deliberate nor intentional, but was occasioned by bona fide reasons beyond the control of the petitioner. 6. Having regard to the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and the cause shown in the application, this Court is of the considered view that sufficient cause has been shown for restoration of CRR No. 374/2024. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to restore the said revision petition. 7. The prayer for restoration of the revision petition is, accordingly, allowed and CRR No. 374/2024 is restored to its original number. The applicant is directed to deposit the costs of Rs.2,000/- with the High Court Legal Services Authority, as directed by this Court vide order dated 18.02.2026, within a period of two weeks from today. 8. Accordingly, the CRMP stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge $ourabh