Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37480 (KAR)

SRI KISHORE G PANDIT v. SMT TRIVENI NARAYANA PANDIT

RFA/2083/2019 · 2026-08-24

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010314422019 NC: 2026:KHC:45326 RFA No. 2083 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2083 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SRI. KISHORE G PANDIT, S/O. LATE. GANAPATHI NARAYAN PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.101, 6TH -B-CROSS, GANAKAL RAJANNA ROAD, VIRUPAKASHPURA, KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU – 590 097. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHASHI KUMAR G.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. TRIVENI NARAYANA PANDIT, W/O. LATE. NARAYANA G PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT NO.365, GRAM BACHGAON, MAJRE HANCHINAKERI, BANAVASI ROAD, SIRSI – 581 402. 2. SRI. GANAPATHI NARAYAN PANDIT, S/O. LATE. NARAYANA G PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.B1106, PURVA HEIGHTS, BILEKANAHALLI, Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010314422019 NC: 2026:KHC:45326 RFA No. 2083 of 2019 BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 076. 3. SMT. LAKSHMI PANDIT, D/O. LATE NARAYANA G PANDIT, W/O SRI.HARISH HEGADE, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.365, GRAM BACHGAON, MAJRE HANCHINAKERI, BANAVASI ROAD, SIRSI – 581 402. 4. SRI. VINAYAK GANAPATI PANDIT, S/O. LATE. GANAPATHI NARAYANA PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT NO.002, GROUND FLOOR, PREMIER APARTMENTS, 5TH MAIN ROAD, OPP: 108 GANESH TEMPLE, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 078. 5. SMT. SHOBHA M PANDIT, W/O. LATE. MADHUKAR G PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT ROCKEY ESTATE, BELAGOLA, BOGASE POST, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK, CHIKAMAGALUR – 577 130. 6. SMT. YOGESHWARI G.S., W/O. SRI. KISHOR G PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. # 101, 6TH -B-CRAOSS, GANAKAL RAJANNA ROAD, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010314422019 NC: 2026:KHC:45326 RFA No. 2083 of 2019 VEERUPAKSHAPURA, BENGALURU – 560 097. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.100/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE IST ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT In view of the judgment dated 08.07.2026 passed in W.P.No.17588/2024 c/w W.A.No.200260/2025 (GM-RES), by the Division Bench of this Court, which is affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Diary No.41232/2026 in SLP (C) No.025075/2026, this matter is required to be heard and disposed by the jurisdictional District Court. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010314422019 NC: 2026:KHC:45326 RFA No. 2083 of 2019 2. Accordingly, Registry is directed to transmit the entire file including the trial Court records, if any, relating to the appeal to the jurisdictional District Court. 3. Interim order granted, if any, shall continue till further orders to be passed by the jurisdictional District Court. 4. Accordingly, for statistical purpose, the appeal is disposed of. The parties shall appear before the jurisdictional District Court on 26.10.2026. Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE SPV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3