- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322872026 NC: 2026:KHC:46734-DB RP No. 263 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REVIEW PETITION NO. 263 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI SWAMY S/O LATE MARI MADAPAA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MANIGERE VILLAGE, C.A. KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA-571428 REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER MAHADEVASWAMY …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V B RAVISHANKER., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA 571 401 3. SRI SOMESHWARA SWAMY DEVARU AND SRI KADU BASAVESHWARA SWAMY DEVARU Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322872026 NC: 2026:KHC:46734-DB RP No. 263 of 2026 MANIGERE, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRCT REPRESENTED BY THE TALUK MUZARAI OFFICER THE TAHASILDAR MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 428 4. SRI SHIVAMALLU S/O. LATE MADAPPA AGES ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MANIGERE VILLAGE, C. A. KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 428 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVINDRANATH.B, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED.27.10.2025 PASSED IN W.A.NO.563/2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS DEEMED FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPEAL FILED IN WA NO.563/2025 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present review petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment and order dated 27.10.2025 passed by this Court in W.A.No.563/2025. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010322872026 NC: 2026:KHC:46734-DB RP No. 263 of 2026 2. In the garb of review petition, rehearing of the matter cannot be done. The matter was decided after hearing the parties. If the review petitioner is not satisfied with the judgment and order passed by this Court, he can take recourse to the remedy as may be available to him under the law. 3. A review can be sought only if there is an error apparent on the face of the record, either of law or facts. In the present case, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record, either of law or facts. We, therefore, dismiss this review petition. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1