SHRI SURENDRA KUMAR CHANDRA v. DIRECOTRATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
WPC/5410/2021 · 2026-09-27
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37467 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37467 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010348672021
2026:CGHC:42189
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5410 of 2021 1 - Shri Surendra Kumar Chandra S/o Shri Radheshyam Chandra Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Katari, Tehsil, Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Rajkumari Chandra W/o Shri Surendra Kumar Chandra Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Katari, Tehsil, Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioners versus 1 - Direcotrate Of Enforcement, Government Of India A-1 Block, Pujari Chambers, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Deputy Director, Directorate Of Enforcement, Government Of India, A-1 Block, Pujari Chambers, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Kartik Katuria, learned Advocate holding brief of Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble
Mr.
Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
28/09/2026
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2026.09.30 12:39:37 +0530
2
“1. That, the Hon’ble Court may issue writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directons, declaring that the provisional attachment order No. 03/2021 dated 04.06.2021 issued by respondent No. 01Ed and all proceedings emanating therefrom including original complaint No. 1488/2021 has lapsed and ceased to have any effect on and from the expiry of 180 days period provided under Section 5 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 i.e. from 04.06.2021.
2. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. No objection has been raised from other side.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Ami