Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37465 (PNJ)

GURPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/34211/2026 · 2026-08-27

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34211-2026 Date of decision :27.08.2026 GURPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Manpreet Singh Dua, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kuljinder Singh Dhindsa, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS in case bearing FIR No.116 dated 19.05.2026 registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Tibba, Commissonerate Ludhiana, District Ludhiana. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of the order dated 19.06.2026, the petitioners have joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. The learned State counsel on instructions admits the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioners is no more required for further investigation in the case. In view of aforesaid factual position, the interim order dated 19.06.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioners shall keep on JITESH LAL 2026.08.27 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-34211-2026 -2- joining the investigation as and when required to do so and they shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 27.08.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.08.27 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document