Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3744 (UTT)

RAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/670/2026 · 2026-04-27

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21. BA] SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3137 BA1 No.670 of 2026 Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.04 of 2026 under Sections 8, 20, 29, 60 of the NDPS Act and Sections 111(2)(ii), (3), (4) of BNS Act, Police Station Lansdowne, District Pauri Garhwal. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the contraband involved in the present matter i.e. ganja has not been recovered from the possession of the applicant and applicant cannot be linked with the same in any manner whatsoever. He further submits that simply there being a transaction between the co-accused and the present applicant and he has been linked up and made an accused in the present matter whereas there being no role regarding the supply and seizure or even as a beneficiary in the proceed of crime i.e. illegal possession of the contraband named ganja. 6. Learned State counsel strongly opposed the bail application and submits that applicant has a criminal history and he has involved in a similar case of Narcotics, therefore, the applicant should not be granted bail. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Rajendra Singh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 27.04.2026 Arti