Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3744 (DEL)

RICHA ELECTRICALS v. VINAYSHEEL SAXENA & ORS.

CONT.CAS(C)/714/2026 · 2026-04-24

Sachin Datta

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT.CAS(C) 714/2026 $~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.04.2026 + RICHA ELECTRICALS .....Petitioner CONT.CAS(C) 714/2026 Through: Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, Adv. versus VINAYSHEEL SAXENA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel and Mr. Siddharth Arora, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.27459/2026 (Exemption) 2. Application stands disposed of. 3. It transpires that pursuant to the directions contained in the order dated 17.12.2025 passed in W.P.(C) 18417/2025 and order dated 12.01.2026, passed in CONT. CAS(C) 38/2026, certain documents have been provided to the petitioner. CONT.CAS(C) 714/2026 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that some of the said documents are forged / fabricated. If so, the petitioner would be at liberty to take appropriate legal recourse by way of, inter alia, initiating appropriate criminal and civil proceedings with regard thereto. 5. No further orders are required to be passed in the contempt Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:28.04.2026 13:47:40 Signature Not Verified CONT.CAS(C) 714/2026 proceedings. 6. The petitioner is accordingly disposed of, granting the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion of this Court as regards the allegations levied by the petitioner. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 24, 2026/cl By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:28.04.2026 13:47:40