Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3744 (BOM)

HAVI JAIKISHAN JAINANI AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR MINISTRY OF COOPERATIVE AFFAIRS AND ORS

WP/10474/2026 · 2026-08-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

34-WP-10474-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10474 OF 2026 Havi Jaikishan Jainani & Anr. ..Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors …Respondents Mr. Manoj Prajapati a/w Mr. Ranjan Dwivedi, for the Petitioners. Mr. Y D Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr. Ashish Gatagat, Mr. Karan Bhadoria, Ms. Jaitali Mathuria for Respondent No.4. Mr. Aditya Shiralkar, a/w Mr. Vijay Poojari, Mr. Aditya Hegde i/b Shiralkar & Co., for Respondent No. 6. Mr. Digamber Kawale, for Respondent Nos.7 to 9 – BMC. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 17th August 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Prajapati, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to work out the remedies as available in law. 3. Leave granted with liberty as prayed for. 4. The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. SAINATH, PA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.08.19 09:56:24 +0530 34-WP-10474-2026.DOC 5. The learned Judge, City Civil Court is requested to hear and decide the Notice of Motion taken out in the suit instituted by the petitioner and others, as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is clarified that, this Court has not entered into the merits of the matter. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 2/2