102+204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-13628-CII-2026 IN/AND COCP-1422-2026 Date of Decision:- 03.09.2026 MEENAKSHI BAWEJA AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Vs. DEEPAK BAWEJA ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Viren Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sehajpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Amitabh Tewari, Advocate for the respondent. ***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel representing petitioners states that matter is mutually settled between the parties before Mediation and Conciliation Centre vide Settlement/Agreement dated 26.08.2026. Learned counsel for petitioners has also supplied copy of aforesaid Settlement/Agreement and same is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Therefore, at this stage, he does not want to pursue present contempt petition and accordingly, withdraws the same. 2. Ms. Sehajpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Amitabh Tewari, Advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent, which is taken on record. Aforesaid Settlement/Agreement is confirmed by learned counsel representing respondent. 3. In view of statement, present contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. LALIT SHARMA 2026.09.03 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-13628-CII-2026 IN/AND COCP-1422-2026 -2- 4. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 03.09.2026 lalit Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No LALIT SHARMA 2026.09.03 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document