- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010145412024 NC: 2026:KHC:46870 WP No. 8503 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 8503 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M. ABRAHAM DIVAKAR S/O. LATE M. MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO. 4/119, BASAPPA EXTENSION, KUSHAL NAGAR, KODAGU-571 234. AT ALSO NO. 2/235, B M ROAD KUSHAL NAGAR SOMWAR PET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571234 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDAN S RAO.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHASILDAR SOMAVARAPETE TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 234. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KODAGU, MADAKERE DISTRICT-571 234. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010145412024 NC: 2026:KHC:46870 WP No. 8503 of 2024 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KODAGU, MADAKERE DISTRICT-571 234. 4. P. S. JANARDHANA S/O. P. M. SOMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, SOMAVARAPETE TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 234. 5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI, SOMWARPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 234. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SKANDA R K RAO, AGA FOR R1 TO 3 & R5, SRI.T A KURUMBAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO. MC/OBJECTION /51/2013-14 DTD 14.02.2014 PASSED BY THE R-1 (ANNX-D) CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF APPEAL 349/2019- 20 AND ETC.,. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 19.10.2022 (Annexure-H) passed by respondent - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010145412024 NC: 2026:KHC:46870 WP No. 8503 of 2024 No.2, and the order dated 19.12.2023 (Annexure-K) passed by respondent No.3. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the impugned orders would indicate that the khata has been mutated pursuant to the execution of the registered sale deed. 3. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that no interference is called for in this writ petition. However, it is open for the petitioner to establish his right over the land in question in a manner known to law. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16