IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53882 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2025 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Pandav Yadav @ Prahlad Yadav Son of Late Lakhanlal Yadav Resident of Village - Shishwa, Police Station - Gogari, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vivekanand Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 5 19-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Gogari P.S. Case No. 138 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 109, 308(5), 352, 351(2) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner repeatedly halted road construction on informant’s private land, demanding an extortion of Rs. 5 lakh. On 01.06.2025, petitioner along with one co- accused person, fired at the informant and forcibly took Rs. 25,000/- at gunpoint as a partial payment and threatened him to pay remaining balance within a week. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53882 of 2025(5) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 It has further been submitted that the FIR shows that construction of pathway was going on, on the personal land of the informant and allegedly, petitioner along with one unknown, fired three shots upon the informant but he did not suffer any kind of firearm injury. The petitioner and the informant have compromised the case. The petitioner is under custody since 08.06.2025. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Gogari P.S. Case No. 138 of 2025, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T