1 (SA No. 361 of 2017) CGHC010095872017 2026:CGHC:42601 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 361 of 2017 1 - Lachchhiram S/o Kasiram, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Old Tahsil Sakti, Present Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Bharatlal S/o Kasiram, Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Old Tahsil Sakti, Present Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Manoj S/o Kasiram, Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Old Tahsil Sakti, Present Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sahodrabai W/o Kasiram, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Old Tahsil Sakti, Present Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ................Plaintiffs, --- Appellant(s) versus 1 - Ghasnin W/o Kisun, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Tahsil Sakti, The Then District Bilaspur Now Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Nankibai Wd/o Late Lalji, Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Tahsil Sakti, The Then District Bilaspur Now Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Anandram Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Tahsil Sakti, The Then District Bilaspur Now Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Rajkumar S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Tahsil Sakti, The Then District Bilaspur Now Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2026.10.01 11:19:39 +0530 2 (SA No. 361 of 2017) 5 - Iswari S/o Padum, Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Devgaon Pasbasin, Tahsil Sakti, The Then District Bilaspur Now Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - Khiklal S/o Vishal, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Devgaon Presently Residing At Village Rogda, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 7 - State Of Madhya Pradesh Now Chhattisgarh, Through District Collector, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 8 - Dhananjay Kumar Kurmi S/o Toliram, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Devgaon, P.S. Dabhra, Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 9 - Dhaneshwar Kumar Kurmi S/o Toliram, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Devgaon, P.S. Dabhra, Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 10 - Devkunwar D/o Rameshwar, Aged About 53 Years W/o Charoram, R/o Village Malda, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 11 - Indrabai D/o Toliram, Aged About 50 Years W/o Pothiram, R/o Village Vandabhara, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 12 - Tulsabai D/o Toliram, Aged About 48 Years W/o Manesh Ram, R/o Village Gudrukala, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 13 - Ombai D/o Toliram, Aged About 51 Years W/o Mithai Ram, R/o Village Pendri, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, Presently R/o Village Chandrasekarpur Arnu, Beside Of Dharam Colony, P.S. Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 14 - Rukmani D/o Toliram, Aged About 45 Years W/o Guha Ram, R/o Village Marghatti, Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, Present R/o Village Rajamal, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh 15 - Prembai D/o Toliram, Aged About 34 Years W/o Shyam Kumari, R/o Village Gudrukala, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 (SA No. 361 of 2017) 16 - Radhebai D/o Toliram, Aged About 53 Years W/o Puniram, R/o Village Gudrukala, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ................Defendants --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :- None in two rounds. For Respondent No.7/State :- Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB - Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant Judgment On Board 30.09.2026 1. This second appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 20.03.2017 passed by learned First Additional District Judge, Sakti, District – Janjgir-Champa in Civil Appeal No.02-A/2014. 2. Even on the second call, none appeared on behalf of the appellant, nor was any representation made on his behalf. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge @d!t!