Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37406 (CHH)

PRADEEP SINGH PARIHAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/144/2010 · 2026-09-28

Shri Sudhir Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010001232010 2026:CGHC:42394 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Appeal No.144 of 2010 Pradeep Singh Parihar, S/o Ramvihar Singh Parihar, aged about 30 years, R/o Narmadanagar, Ring Road No.2, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG) ... Appellant versus State Of Chhattisgarh through the Police Station Chakarbhata, District Bilaspur ... Respondent For Appellant : Shri Siddhant Tiwari appears on behalf of Shri UKS Chandel, Advocates. For State/Respondent : Smt Sonia Kuldeep, PL. Hon'ble Shri Sudhir Kumar , Judge Order on Board 29.09.2026 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 14.07.2008 passed by the learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) and Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Special Case No.07/2008, SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2026.09.29 17:15:06 +0530 2 whereby the Jeep bearing Registration No. CG-10/BA-2217, allegedly used for transportation of 34.900 kg of ganja, was ordered to be confiscated in favour of the State, as also the order dated 18.06.2009 passed by the learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Bilaspur (C.G.) in M.J.C. No.13/2009, whereby the application filed by the Appellant under Section 457 of the Cr.P.C. seeking release of the said vehicle on supurdnama was rejected, the Appellant has preferred the present Criminal Appeal. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that he has no instructions to prosecute the present Appeal. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, there being no instructions to prosecute the matter on behalf of the Appellant, the present Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (Sudhir Kumar) Judge Priya