SHEEBAZ HOTEL PVT LTD v. BRIJ BHUSHAN NOW DECEASED THR LRS AND OTHERS
TA/861/2026 · 2026-08-26
Harkesh Manuja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37396 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37396 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
TA-861-2026 (O&M) --1-- 102+213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA-861-2026 (O&M) Decided on:-26.08.2026 Sheebaz Hotel Pvt. Ltd. and another ….Applicants. vs. Brij Bhushan and others ….Respondents.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate, for the applicants. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. ***** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral) CM-16939-CII-2026 Application is allowed as prayed for. Document (Annexure P-7) is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Main case
1. The applicants, by way of present application, seek transfer of Execution Petition bearing EXE/35935/2013, titled "Brij Bhushan Versus Harnam Singh" filed at the instance of respondent-Brij Bhushan; from the learned Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana to any competent Court in Haryana and outside Punjab. 2. The short point raised in the present transfer application is that the applicants apprehend delay in the disposal of their claim at the hands of the Advocates appearing before the Courts at Ludhiana. SONIKA 2026.08.31 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
TA-861-2026 (O&M) --2--
3. On the other hand, the prayer made on behalf of the applicant has been vehemently opposed by learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 while controverting the averments made in the application. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties besides going through the paper-book. 5. Upon perusal of the record, in the humble opinion of this Court, there is no sufficient cause in favour of the applicants for seeking transfer of the execution application. However, in view of the exceptional circumstances, wherein the applicants apprehend some delay in the disposal of their claim and further, when the respondents through their counsel consent for transfer of the matter to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Khanna, the prayer needs to be granted. 6. Consequently the transfer application is allowed and the execution petition bearing EXE/35935/2013, titled “Brij Bhushan versus Harnam Singh” filed at the instance of respondent-Brij Bhushan, stands transferred from the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, to the competent Court of Jurisdiction at Khanna. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana to the Court concerned. 7. The parties are directed to appear before the competent Court of Jurusdiction at Khanna on 01.09.2026. 8. The Executing Court by all means shall adjudicate upon the dispute finally within a period of three months from the date of appearance of the parties.
In case, either of the parties pray for unnecessary adjournment, they be subjected to exceptional costs to be paid to the other SONIKA 2026.08.31 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
TA-861-2026 (O&M) --3-- side for delaying the matter as compensatory. 9. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed off. 26.08.2026
(HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE (i) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2026.08.31 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document