Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37381 (PNJ)

KRISHNA NAND v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/49326/2026 · 2026-09-02

To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-49348-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CRM-M-49326-2026 Date of Decision : 02.09.2026 KRISHNA NAND …. PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …. RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Ms. Komalpreet, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ritu Raj Singh, DAG, Punjab. **** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at Bar that at this stage, the petitioner shall be contented if a direction is issued to the official respondents to decide representation Annexure P-8 of the petitioner within a time bound schedule. 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only at this stage. 4. Mr. Ritu Raj Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on their behalf and makes a statement at Bar that in view of the limited stand taken today in the Court, he does not intend to file response to the petition in question. He also states that the representation Annexure P-8 of the petitioner shall be disposed off in accordance with law within a period of 30 days from today. ANJU GOEL 2026.09.02 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-49348-2026 (O&M) -2- 5. In view thereof, nothing survives in the present petition. It as well as interim application/s, if any, stand/s disposed off. (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE 02.09.2026 anju Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2026.09.02 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document