Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3736 (BOM)

ANAND NAGESH MISTRI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ABA/1891/2026 · 2026-08-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

55-ABA-1891-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1891 OF 2026 Anand Nagesh Mistri ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents —————— Mr. Murtaza Najmi a/w Avinash Ovhal, Farida Najmi, Nancy Kanungo & Arefa Siddiquie, for the Applicant. Ms. S. M. Yadav APP, for the Respondent-State. API Suresh Kharat, Ulwa Police Station, Navi Mumbai, present. —————— Coram: Madhav J. Jamdar, J. Date: August 17, 2026 P.C.: 1. Mr. Murtaza Najmi, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application. 2. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. [Madhav J. Jamdar, J.] Arjun 1 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2026.08.18 13:06:06 +0530