1 CGHC010197882024 2026:CGHC:42576-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3015 of 2024 Naisha Ubeja D/o Dr. Navneet Singh Ubeja, Aged About 18 Years Minor Through Guardian (Father), R/o Nirala Nagar, Telephone Exchange Road, Bi- laspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Department Of Health And Family Nirman Bhawa, New Delhi. 2 - The Director, National Testing Agency, National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test, Department Of Higher Education Ministry Of Education, Government Of India, Nsic-Mdbp Building, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi, Delhi 110020 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretrary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Directorate Of Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - National Medical Commission Through- Secretary, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka Phase -1, New Delhi-110077, India. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Swajeet Singh Ubeja, Adv. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Vikas Ghritlahre, Adv. on behalf of Mr. P.R. Patankar, Adv. For respondent/State : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Addl. Adv. General 2 Hon’ble Mr. Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Santosh Sharma, Judge Order on Board Per : Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice 30/09/2026 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 The petitioner, in this writ petition, prays for the following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to re-evaluate and allot the correct marks as per amended answer key dated 31.05.2024, that should have been granted to the petitioner, within a period of 7 days. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as deemed necessary as deem fit.” 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the grievance made in this writ petition, has already been redressed, hence, this writ petition has become infructuous. He prays for withdrawal of the writ petition. 4 Mr. R.K. Gupta, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the State and Mr. Vikas Ghirtlahre, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 do not have any objection to the same. 5 In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn being infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Pathak AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.10.01 11:58:29 +0530