RAMKISHAN MEENA SON OF SHRI CHHITAR MAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4866/2026 · 2026-04-10
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3735 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3735 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4866/2026 Ramkishan Meena Son Of Shri Chhitar Mal Meena, Resident Of Bilwa Khurd Mansar Kheri, Police Station Bassi, Jaipur (Raj.) (The Accused-Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 10/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.896/2025, registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East), for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1), 189(2), 121(1), 132, 324(5) and 303(2) of BNS and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and Section 4/21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and Sections 54/60 of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is not named in the FIR, there are no allegations against the petitioner that the petitioner caused any injury to Government Official rather the allegations
[2026:RJ-JP:15159] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4866/2026] against the petitioner is only with regards to indulging in the act of illegal mining. It is further contended that the petitioner is in custody since 25.02.2026, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, charge-sheet has already been submitted and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that petitioner's name is not mentioned in the FIR and in the impugned order passed by learned trial Court, it was recorded that though the petitioner was not involved in committing the offence of assault upon the Government Official, therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Ramkishan Meena Son Of Shri Chhitar Mal Meena, in connection with FIR No.896/2025, registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-18