JAGDISH PRASAD AGARWAL @ JAGDISH v. PUSPA @ PUSHPA CHETTRI
FA/3/2024 · 2026-09-01
Ravi Krishan Kapur, Supratim Bhattacharya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37339 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37339 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L 17 Court no. 11 September 1, 2026. KAUSHIK
Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
F.A. 3 of 2024
Sri Jagdish Prasad Agarwal @ Jagadish Vs. Puspa @ Pushpa Chettri
None appears on behalf of the appellant even in the second call. It appears from the Office Report that despite notice of the arrival of Trial Court records being served on the Advocate on Record of the appellant as far back as on 28 August, 2025, no steps have been taken whatsoever by the appellant. In view of the failure of the appellant to take steps in the preparation of the paper books and comply with all necessary formalities, F.A. 3 of 2024 stands dismissed for default.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)