Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37338 (PNJ)

RAHUL SAINI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/9044/2026 · 2026-09-02

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CRWP-9044-2026 (O&M) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRWP-9044-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2026 RAHUL SAINI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to take immediate and effective action for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner from respondents No.4 to 6 and further issuance of directions to decide representation dated 23.07.2026 submitted by the petitioner. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner submitted a representation dated 23.07.2026 to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Mahendergarh, and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide representation dated 23.07.2026 moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.02 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CRWP-9044-2026 (O&M) 4. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Addl. A.G. Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits the needful would be done in due course. 5. Keeping in view the prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the aforesaid representation dated 23.07.2026 submitted by petitioner in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 6. However, if, respondent No. 2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 02.09.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.02 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document