Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3733 (UTT)

AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/724/2026 · 2026-04-24

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:3120 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 724 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. D.N. Sharma and Mrs. Manju Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The instant petition is thoroughly misconceived since the petitioner is praying for registration of First Information Report on the basis of written complaint dated 02.03.2026. 4. Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder, seriously object on the maintainability of the petition by submitting that the petitioner has a remedy to prefer an application under section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023, before the court concerned. 5. I found force on submission of Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State, and hence, the petition is dismissed being devoid of merit; however the petitioner can avail the remedy as provided under law. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 24.04.2026 PR 2026:UHC:3120