1 Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : 02.07.2026 APHC010490162023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5351/2023 Between: 1. BHIMAVARAPU GIRIDHAR KUMAR REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/O H.NO.59-7-7, RAMACHANDRA NAGAR VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT (NOW, NTR DISTRICT), ANDHRA PRADESH 520 008 ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANURAG JAIN I A S, AGED MAJOR, OCC SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS UNION OF INDIA, ROOM NO.501, TRANSPORT BHAVAN NO.1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI- 110 001 2. SRI SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV I A S, AGED MAJOR, OCC CHAIRPERSON/CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ROOM NO.501, TRANSPORT BHAVAN NO.1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI - 110 001 3. SRI D V NARAYANA REDDY, AGED MAJOR, OCC PROJECT DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA 21, GURU NANAK COLONY ROAD OPP.LAKSHMI VILAS BANK, TEACHERS' COLONY GURU NANAK COLONY, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH 520 007 4. DR APARAJITA SINGH SINSINWAR I A S, AGED- MAJOR, OCC THE COMPETANT AUTHORTIY, LAND ACQUISITON -CUM-JOINT 2 COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon and punish the respondents/contemnors for their willful disobedience and defiance to the orders dated 16-03-2023 passed in W.P No.10795 of 2019 by his Lordship Hon'ble Justice Sri Ravi Cheemalapati, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. . 2. The Court made the following order: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of orders dated 16.03.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.10795/2019. 2. Sri G.Rajeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, pursuant to filing of this contempt case, the respondent authorities have passed orders on the petitioner’s representation and the petitioner wants to question the said order, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt case. 3 Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 25.06.2026 BRS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No