Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37315 (KAR)

SMT GAYATHRI v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/25602/2025 · 2026-08-29

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010553342025 NC: 2026:KHC:46858 WP No. 25602 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 25602 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT GAYATHRI D/O. LATE RAJARAM, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.35, 2ND MAIN SARASWATHINAGARA, BANGALORE-560040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.MAHESH L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE - 560001. 2. THE THAHASILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562106. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562106. 4. SMT. JAYASHREE LAKSHMINARAYAN W/O. V.LAKSHMINARAYAN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010553342025 NC: 2026:KHC:46858 WP No. 25602 of 2025 RESIDING AT NO. 221, 1ST D CROSS 3RD BLOCK, HBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 043. 5. SRI. K.N.SRINATH S/O. LATE K.NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 6. SMT. GIRIJA K.N AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O. LATE K.NANJUNDAIAH 7. SMT. GEETHA K.N D/O. LATE K.NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 8. SMT. SHYLAJA S/O. LATE K.NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESPONDENTS 5 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT NO.53, KANASU, 5TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, PF LAYOUT, NEAR MARUTHI MANDIRA, VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-560040. 9. SRI. SURYANARAYANA SHASTRI S/O. LATE DAKSHINAMURTHY SHASTHRI AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS RESIDING AT KUGURU VILLAGE, KUGURU POST SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE-562125. 10. SRI. P. MUNIVENKATAPPA S/O. LATE PAPAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT MADAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUGURU POST, SARJAPURA HOBLI - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010553342025 NC: 2026:KHC:46858 WP No. 25602 of 2025 ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3, SRI PRAKASH P R, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE ASST COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION IN RA (A) NO.173/2022 DTD 3.06.2022 AND ORDERS PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DIST IN RP NO. 130/2023 DTD 22.04.2025 DTD 9.04.2025 VIDE ANNX-A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 03.06.2022 (Annexure-C) passed by the respondent No.3 and order dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure- A) passed by the respondent No.1. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010553342025 NC: 2026:KHC:46858 WP No. 25602 of 2025 forthcoming that O.S.No.589/2023 is pending consideration before the competent Civil Court, wherein the respective shares of the parties have to be crystallized. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. 4. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the respondent-Authorities only after conclusion of the aforementioned suit. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6