Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37311 (CAL)

TAPAN BHATTACHARJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/285/2026 · 2026-09-01

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01/09 2026 AD/02/18 266312 NANDY (DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/285/2026 TAPAN BHATTACHARJEE VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharya, Sr. Advocate Mr. Debdutta Raha, Advocate Mr. Raju Bhattacharyya, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Ms. Aparna Banerjee, ld. AGP Mr. Suman Chattopadhyay, Advocate ……for the State 1. Pursuant to the direction passed on 20.08.2026, the respondent no. 2 has filed a report by way of an affidavit. 2. It appears from the report that all requisite documents have been sent and submitted to the Principal Secretary, Judicial Department, Government of West Bengal. 3. In view thereof, respondent no. 1, is directed to consider the records and, if found eligible, to regularize the leave taken by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of intimation of this order by the petitioner to the said respondent no. 1. 4. If found eligible, all consequential steps will be taken within a period of two weeks thereafter. 5. With these observations, the writ-petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. All parties to act on the server copy of this order, duly downloaded from the official website of this Hon’ble Court.. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2