Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-27727-2026
Date of decision :27.08.2026 AABID ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Rosi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) On 06.07.2026, the following order was passed:-
“The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case registered against him vide FIR No.278 dated 16.12.2025 under Sections 341(4), 305 of BNS (Sections 472 and 380 of IPC) (later deleted Section 341(4) of BNS) at Police Station Sadar Tauru, District Nuh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that though the petitioner is a habitual offender and in the present case, he has been nominated as an accused on the basis of the disclosure statement of three arrested accused namely Aashiq, Sarif and Hassan. Notice of motion for 20.08.2026. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer to join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of SHO/Investigating JITESH LAL 2026.08.27 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-27727-2026 -2- Agency, subject to the following conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS.:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation before the investigating officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court and shall surrender his passport, if any.”
2. Thereafter, on 20.08.2026, the following order was passed:-
“The petitioner is directed to join investigation once again on 24.08.2026.”
3. Despite passing of the aforesaid orders, the petitioner has not joined investigation.
4. In view the above, the present petition stands dismissed.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 27.08.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.08.27 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document