1 CGHC010374412026 2026:CGHC:41867 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 901 of 2026 • Siyaram Rawat S/o Punnuram Rawat Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1. Muliabai D/o Late Sukhru Rawat Aged About 44 Years (Wife Of Chintaram Yadav), R/o Biretara, Patwari Circle No. 41, Bhothali, Tah. And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 2. Baisakhinbai W/o Gopal Yadav Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Birtara, Post- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. Sadhinbai W/o Punaram Yadav Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Birtara, Post- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Gopal S/o Jhurag Yadav Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Birtara, Post- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Punaram Yadav S/o Chaitram Rawat Aged About 36 Years R/o Village- Birtara, Post- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 6. Loknath Sahu S/o Vishram Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Birtara, Post- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 7. Nand Kumar S/o Namalum Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Birtara, Post- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 8. Milap S/o Pancham Dhimar Aged About 37 Years R/o Village- Birtara, Post- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 9. Milau S/o Pancham Dhimar Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Birtara, Post- Doma, Tehsil And District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 10. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant(s) For Applicant : Mr. Amitesh Yadav, Advocate For State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.09.28 10:50:10 +0530 2 Order on Board 26.09 .2026 1. The present application has been moved for restoration of FA No. 39 of 2004 which was dismissed on 08.08.2025. 2. Learned counsel for applicant would submit that on account of some unavoidable circumstances, no one could appear before this Court when the matter was taken up for hearing, therefore, FA No. 39 of 2004 was dismissed for want of prosecution. He would submit that the present applicant is interested to pursue the matter. He would pray to restore the appeal to its original number. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose. 4. Having considered the submissions advanced by Mr. Yadav, the instant MCC for restoration of FA No. 39 of 2004 is hereby allowed. The FA No. 39 of 2004 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 3000/- payable to Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee, Bilaspur. 5. Accordingly, the instant MCC is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant