Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3729 (ALL)

SMT. PRATIGYA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

WRIC/17606/2026 · 2026-05-05

Garima Prashad, Saral Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17606 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. May 6, 2026 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Smt. Pratigya .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad