Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37253 (PNJ)

JASVIR KAUR AND OTHERS v. KUMAR RAHUL AND OTHERS

COCP/3509/2026 · 2026-08-27

Deepak Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3509-2026 Date of Decision: August 27, 2026 Jasvir Kaur and others …Pe00oners Versus Shri Kumar Rahul and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Jugam Arora, Advocate for the peoner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) By way of this peon filed under Secons 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Arcle 215 of the Constuon of India, peoners are seeking iniaon of contempt proceedings against the respondents for violang the order dated 28.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CWP No.21316 of 2025. The operave part of the said order is as under:- “3. In view of the above and without commenng upon the merits of the case, this peon is hereby disposed of with a direcon to the respondents to decide the legal noce dated 10.05.2025, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authories would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, a9er noce and hearing offered to them and if found entled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the peoners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon,” 2. Learned counsel for the peoners submits that the aforesaid order has not been complied with so far. 3. Noce of moon. 4. Mr. Ravinder Singh Rawal, AAG, Punjab accepts noce on behalf of the respondents-State. SARITA RANI 2026.08.27 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-3509-2026 - 2 - 2026:PHHC:120535 5. Learned State counsel submits that the order dated 28.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) has already been complied with. He has also placed on record the copy of the speaking order dated 20.08.2026, as per which a9er considering the legal noce of the peoners, their claim has since been rejected being devoid of merit. 6. Since, the order dated 28.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) has been complied with, therefore, nothing else is required to be done. However, in case the peoners are not sasfied with the speaking order dated 20.08.2026 passed by the respondents, they will be at liberty to avail their remedies in accordance with law. Disposed of. August 27, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.08.27 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document