Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP No.3097 of 2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP No.3097 of 2026 (O&M) Date of decision: September 2nd, 2026 Gulzar Singh and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh Narwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. In the headnote of the petition, the following prayers have been made:
“Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ of certiorari, for quashing the eviction order dated 24.09.2024 (Annexure P-3) passed by Respondent No. 3 Under Section 7(2) of the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961 and the appellate order dated 12.11.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by Respondent No. 2, which are ex-facie illegal, perverse, unconstitutional and have resulted in deprivation of the petitioners' residential houses without authority of law. It is further prayed that operation of impugned orders (Annexure P-3 and P-5) may kindly be stayed during the PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.09.02 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CWP No.3097 of 2026 (O&M) 2 pendency of present petition, in the interest of justice. Any other order, writ or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after giving full and better particulars.
3. The petitioners are permitted to withdraw the present petition with the said liberty, however, in case the petitioners wish to file a fresh petition, the petitioners would also annex the written statement filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4, in the present case along with all the annexures and would also annex the application under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 filed by the respondent No.6-Dila Ram as well as the reply filed by the petitioners to the said application.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE September 2nd, 2026
(DIVYA SHARMA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.09.02 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh