IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14421 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2020 Thana- SALIMPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Bhola Sharma @ Chandan Kumar @ Bhol Sharm Son of Upendra Sharma Resident of Village - Lakhipur, P.S. - Salimpur, Dist. - Patna, Bihar. 2. Lakshman Sharma @ Lakshman Kumar Son of Sahdeo Sharma Resident of Village - Lakhipur, P.S. - Salimpur, Dist. - Patna, Bihar. 3. Dhiraj Sharma @ Dhiraj Kumar S/o Late Sahdeo Sharma Resident of Village - Lakhipur, P.S. - Salimpur, Dist. - Patna, Bihar. 4. Laljee Sharma @ Maniraj Kumar @ Laljee Son of Uday Kumar @ Vijay Sharma Resident of Village - Lakhipur, P.S. - Salimpur, Dist. - Patna, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sameer Sawarn For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 31-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in Salimpur P. S. Case No.29 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 354, 307, 506 of the B.N.S. 3. The learned A.P.P., at the outset, submits that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has been issued on 27.03.2023, which amply demonstrates that petitioners are absconder and the case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14421 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026 2/2 is of the Year 2020. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are co- villagers and on account of dispute between the children while playing cricket, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place and the informant alleges that petitioner no.1 tried to molest his wife and when the informant protested, all the accused assaulted him by farsa, lathi, danda causing injury on head while petitioner no.2 assaulted his son by an iron rod causing injury on head. 5. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it manifests that the case is of the Year 2020 and the process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. was issued in the Year 2023 declaring the petitioners as absconder, as such, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. The prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail stand rejected. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T