HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2271 of 2026 Court No. - 84 HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J. Heard Sri Nitish Yadav, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri B.L. Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer to direct the trial court to decide the "Complaint Case No. 4078 of 2024 (Ajay Dubey Vs. Vikash Yadav) Under Section- 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Pending in the Court of A.C.J., N.I. Act- 2, Allahabad Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice. Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that the learned trial court shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides. With this direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. No. 2 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. No. 2 feels aggrieved, he may approach this Court. May 6, 2026 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhaiya Lal Yadav, Dinesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Prashant Mishra-I,J.) Ajay Dubey .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad