Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37240 (PNJ)

CHIMAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/49628/2026 · 2026-09-03

Ramesh Kumari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-49628-2026 (O&M) -1- 128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-49628-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.09.2026 CHIMAN SINGH ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Sandeep Godara, Advocate for Mr. APS Rehan, Advocate for the petitioner. **** RAMESH KUMARI , J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 Cr.P.C.), seeking necessary directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to ensure fair and impartial investigation in case bearing FIR No. 160 dated 01.06.2026, under Sections 82 and 85 of BNS (corresponding Sections 494 & 498-A of IPC), registered at Police Station Sadar Fazilka, District Fazilka and to take necessary action as per representation dated 18.08.2026 (Annexure P-3) 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has recently filed a representation on 18.08.2026 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka (Annexure P-3) raising his grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon. RENU BALA 2026.09.03 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-49628-2026 (O&M) -2- 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Surinderjit S. Nahar, Asst. AG, Punjab who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the aforesaid representation dated 18.08.2026 (Annexure P- 3) of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. 6. It is clarified that, in case the petitioner is found guilty of committing any act/offence, the police shall be at liberty to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law. 03.09.2026 (RAMESH KUMARI) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RENU BALA 2026.09.03 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document