1 CGHC010373282026 2026:CGHC:42081 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9106 of 2026  Mohsin Khan S/o Mateen Khan Aged About 33 Years R/o Cholaroad, Opposite Noor Masjid Nutan School, P.S. Gautam Nagar, Bhopal, District Bhopal M.P. ... Applicant versus  State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer - Police Station - Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh (As Mentioned In Chargesheet) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Siddharth Rathod, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Vivek Sharma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 28.09.2026 1) The applicant has preferred this Second Bail Application under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.151/2025, registered at Police Station Bodla, District : Kabirdham( C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20(B) of NDPS Act. Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.09.28 14:20:09 +0530 2 2) Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on the basis of information given by the informer, police of Police Station Bodla intercepted a SWIFT DZIRE vehicle bearing registration No. CG 04 LT 5931, Upon intercepting the vehicle, search was conducted wherein 57.810 kg of Ganja was seized from the joint possession of present applicant and other co-accused person, therefore, he was arrested. 3) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that earlier bail application i.e. MCRC/6158/2026 preferred by the applicant was rejected vide order dated 10.07.2026 and learned Trial Court was directed to conclude the trial expeditiously. He further submits that there is no progress in trial whereas the applicant, who is surviving on single kidney is in urgent need of better medical treatment, therefore instant bail application may kindly be allowed. 4) On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the first bail application preferred by the applicant has already been rejected and there is no substantial change in circumstances. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail and the application deserves to be rejected. 5) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 3 6) In the present bail application, it is pleaded that applicant is suffering from kidney ailment, however, this ground was available to the applicant in the first bail application preferred by him but the said ground was not raised and the first bail application was rejected on merits vide order dated 10.07.2026. Taking note of the fact that total 57.810 kg of contraband article has been siezed from the joint possession of present applicant and other co- accused person, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. 7) Accordingly, the instant bail application is rejected. 8) However, it is expected that the jail authorities would provide appropriate medical facilities to the applicant. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a