2026:HHC:5343 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1392 of 2026 Decided on: 03.03.2026 Shri Kumad Kumar Sahni … Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Learned Assistant Advocate General submitted that as the petitioner approached this Court after superannuation, the petition otherwise is not maintainable. This issue can be taken into consideration by the Authorities while deciding the representation of the petitioner. 2. These proceedings are closed with the observation that let the petitioner approach the Authorities concerned by way of representation with regard to the issues raised in this petition within a period of four weeks from today and the representation be decided by the Authorities concerned within a period of 12 weeks as from the date of receipt of the representation. The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 03, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?