Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37221 (PAT)

Kumod Ranjan Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./14370/2018 · 2026-02-12

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14370 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2013 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE District- Rohtas ====================================================== Kumod Ranjan Singh S/o Late Bihari Singh, R/o Mohalla- Gopalganj Gaurakshani, Sasaram, P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas at Sasaram, at present Village- Kolha, P.O.- Nonhar, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Birendra Ray Sharma, S/o late Shiv Sakal Sharma, R/o Village and P.O. Nonhar, P.S.- Surajpura, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 4 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order 03.08.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Cr. Revision No. 223 of 2017 by which the aforesaid criminal revision filed on behalf of petitioner against the order dated 21.04.2017 passed in Complaint Case No. 66 of 2013/ Trial No. 771 of 2017 by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rohtas at Sasaram was dismissed. 3. As per report dated 18.09.2025 (kept at flag 'R-1'), Complaint Case No. 66 of 2013 has already been disposed of on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14370 of 2018(4) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 22.02.2020. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case has become infructuous, accordingly, the same may be disposed of. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, the present case is disposed of having become infructuous. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) U T