- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20873 CRL.RP No. 595 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 595 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. G. MOHAN RAO S/O G. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT NIMBAGALL VILLAGE, AD POST, URAVAKONDA MANDALAM AND TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515 312. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.N. VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. VANDANA SAMPALLI W/O G. MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT CJN SAI VIVEKANANDA COLONY, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU - 562 114. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12/03/2026 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE VIII ADDL PRL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL AT BENGALURU ON THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1/2026 FILED UNDER SECTION 29 OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 CRL. APPEAL. NO. 37/2026 AT ANNEXURE A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20873 CRL.RP No. 595 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The petitioner humbly submit that, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above revision petition as the same was filed inadvertently. This Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to return the certified copies of the Annexure A and B to enable the petitioner to file criminal petition challenging the order dated 12.03.2026 passed in Criminal Appeal No.37/2026 pending on the file of VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural. Hence, this memo.” 2. Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. Time spent before this Court shall be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act while computing the limitation in the intended appeal. 4. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the documents after keeping the photo copy. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10