Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3719 (AP)

BATCHU VENKATESWARARAO, VIZIANAGARAM v. SMT. BATCHU RAJYALAKSHMI, VIZIANAGARAM

FCA/141/2010 · 2026-06-23

Balaji Medamalli, D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010227882010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 141/2010 Between: 1. BATCHU VENKATESWARARAO, VIZIANAGARAM, S/O LATE SRI KRISHNA MURTHY BUSINESS R/O D.NO. 13-2-4, ADDEPALLIVARI STRET VIZIANAGARAM ...APPELLANT AND 1. SMT BATCHU RAJYALAKSHMI VIZIANAGARAM, W/o B. Venkateswara Rao Housewife R/o D.No. 4/9, Plot No. 149 Srinivasa Nagar, Dasannapeta Ring Road Vizianagaram ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2010(FCAMP 360 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order and decree made in FCOP No. 24/09 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court Cum Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram dt. 04-03-10, pending disposal of the present appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 2 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 141 of 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) The present Family Court Appeal has been preferred challenging the order and decree dated 04.3.2010 passed by the learned Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Court, Vizianagaram in F.C.O.P.No.24/2009 in granting maintenance of Rs.4,000/- per month to the respondent/petitioner herein under Section 18 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act and Section 7(1)(c) of Family Courts Act. 2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that after filing this Appeal both appellant and respondent died and hence no cause is survives for adjudication in this appeal and requested to dismiss the appeal. 3. The said submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record. 4. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH ___________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 24.6.2026 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 141 of 2010 24.6.2026 RD