118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10344-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 SUKHDEV KAUR ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Article 226 is for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent Nos.7 and 8, who are harassing her and also against false implication in any criminal case. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner had received a call from Head Constable Kulwinder Singh and, therefore, she apprehends false implication at the hands of the private respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, contends that Head Constable Kulwinder Singh on the instructions of Inspector Harwinder Singh had called the petitioner in pursuance to her own application (Annexure P-1). 4. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court at this stage. VISHAL SETHI 2026.08.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10344-2026 -2- 5. Disposed of. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE August 27, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.08.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document