Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37178 (CAL)

KHURSHID AHMED v. TANWEER AHMAD AND ORS.

FAT/185/2026 · 2026-09-01

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, Sandip Kumar De

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L.4. September 1, 2026. MNS. FAT No. 185 of 2026 + CAN 1 of 2026 Khurshid Ahmed Vs. Tanweer Ahmad and others Mr. P. Pathak, Adv. … for the appellant. Mr. Shubham Khan, Adv. …for the respondents. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal since the impugned order is not an appealable one, with liberty to file a proper challenge against the same. 2. Accordingly, FAT No. 185 of 2026 and CAN 1 of 2026 are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellant to prefer a properly constituted challenge before the appropriate forum/court against the self-same impugned order. 3. There will be no order as to costs. 4. Liberty is granted to the learned Advocate-on-record for the appellant to take back the certified copy of the impugned order, upon furnishing a photocopy thereof for the records. (Sandip Kumar De, J.) (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)