Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37175 (CHH)

SURESH KOTHARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/900/2026 · 2026-09-24

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Smt Sushma Sawant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010379292026 2026:CGHC:41646-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 900 of 2026 Suresh Kothari S/o Late Aaskaram Kothari Aged About 64 Years Occupation Business, R/o Sadar Bazar, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh Presently R/o H I G 160, Padmanabhpur, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Applicant Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector/ Ex Officio Secretary, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 2.1 - Praveen Tandon S/o Late Shri K.C. Tandon Aged About 53 Years R/o House No. 6/1 Nehru Nagar (East) Opposite Lokmanya Tilak Garden, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh 2.2 - Bhavika Tandon D/o Praveen Tandon Aged About 23 Years R/o House No. 6/1 Nehru Nagar (East) Opposite Lokmanya Tilak Garden, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh 2.3 - Yash Tandon S/o Praveen Tandon Aged About 20 Years R/o House No. 6/1 Nehru Nagar (East) Opposite Lokmanya Tilak Garden, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Ms. Anu Mishra, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Avinash Singh, Government Adv. and Mr. AC Sahu, Adv. respectively ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sushma Sawant Order on Board (25.09.2026) 1. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of FA-393-2016 (Suresh Kothari v. State of Chhattisgarh and another), which was SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 22.09.2026. 2. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant as also for the reasons assigned in the application, we deem it appropriate to allow this MCC. Accordingly, the order dated 22.09.2026 passed in FA-393-2016 is hereby recalled. FA- 393-2016 is restored to its original number. 3. Consequently, the MCC is allowed. Sd/- sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge s@if