POONAM 2026.09.03 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-34871-2025 (O&M) -2- statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioner is quashed. 4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. 5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and the private respondent is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question. 6. In view of the report of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (I), Gurugram, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed, qua the petitioner. 7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 02.09.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No POONAM 2026.09.03 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document