01.09.2026 Sl.No. 3 Ct. 39 Allowed Amalranjan In The High Court At Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side CRM (A) No. 2041 of 2026 In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; filed in connection with Gangarampur Police Station Case no. 47/2026 dated 29.01.2026 under Sections 109(1)/117(2)/351(2)/85/89/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, corresponding to GR no. 121/2026. -And- In the matter of : Narsin Parvin @ Nasrin Parvin & Ors. …Petitioners Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda ….for the petitioners Mr. Debajyoti Adhikari Mr. Shivam Mishra …for the State Mr. B. Bhattacharya Mr. Abhik Sen Mr. Poonnuy Roy …for the defacto-complainant 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State produced the compliance report as well as memo of evidence indicating that no details of injury and X-Ray have been found in the prescription. The same is taken on record. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner no. 2. is the husband and the others are in-laws of the defacto-complainant. They are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case after 15 years of her marriage. 2 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State also produces the case diary, and relies upon the injury report suffered by the victim and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 4. Heard the learned counsels for the respective parties and perused the case diary, memo of evidence including the injury and compliance report filed by the I.O., this court finds that the injury suffered by the victim is simple in nature and furthermore, the injury report indicates that the victim sustained injury by assaulting someone else. Chargesheet has already been submitted. Therefore, this is a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners as there is no need of custodial interrogation/detention. 5. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, namely, 1. Narsin Parvin @ Nasrin Parvin, 2. Latifur Rahaman, 3. Oheda Khatun and 4. Nurifa Bibi is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangarampur at Buniadpur, Dakshin Dinajpur, on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. corresponding 3 to Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. In the event the petitioners fail to comply with any of the conditions as imposed by this court, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this court in accordance with law. 8. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. 9. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. 10. The concerned department is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )