SUMAN RANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/10664/2026 · 2026-09-03
To Be Nominated
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37157 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37157 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-10664-2026 #1#
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
110
CRWP-10664-2026
Date of Decision:-03.09.2026
Suman Rani & Anr.
......Petitioners. Vs.
State of Punjab & Ors.
......Respondents.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present:- Mr. H.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG Punjab.
***
RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioners say that they have married each other but against the wishes of the private respondents. They also say that they have moved a representation Annexure P-5 for protection of their life and liberty but it has not been decided till date.
2.
Notice of motion to the official respondents only at this stage.
3.
Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG Punjab accepts notice on their behalf and makes a statement at Bar that for the prayer made in the petition, he does not intend to file response to it.
4. In view of his such statement but without commenting anything upon the validity or otherwise of the alleged marriage of the petitioners and contents of the petition in question, the present petition is disposed off with a SAILESH RANJAN 2026.09.03 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document bottom left
CRWP-10664-2026 #2#
direction to the official respondents to decide the representation Annexure P- 5 of the petitioners in accordance with law and if the need be, protect their life and liberty.
5.
Interim application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed off.
( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI )
JUDGE 03.09.2026 Vinay
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SAILESH RANJAN 2026.09.03 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document bottom left