1 CGHC010321132022 2026:CGHC:41800 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4328 of 2022 1 - Gore Lal Patel S/o Shri Jagdish Patel Aged About 44 Years R/o House No. 85, Ward No. 9, Kanpa, Kanpa (Beltorai), Beltara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Bhagwat Verma S/o Shri Gayaram Verma Aged About 52 Years R/o Lodhipara, Ward No. 08, Kanpa, Kanpa (Beltorai), District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rohit Kumar Verma S/o Shri Puhuk Verma Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Kanpa, Kanpa (Beltorai), District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Bemetara Office Of Collector, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Tehsildar Thankhamariya, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 5 - Gram Panchayat Tedhi, Through Its Secretary, Office Of Gram Panchayat, Tedhi, Janpad Panchayat Saja, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 6 - Takeshwar Patel Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Tedhi, Janpad Panchayat Saja, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Ms. Rakshita Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate For State :- Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. For Respondents No. 5 & 6 :- Mr. Arvind Prasad, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 25.09.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had made a complaint against the concerned Sarpanch; however, by efflux of time, the tenure of the said Sarpanch has come to an end. In view of the subsequent development, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the present petition. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha