-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CWP-1895-2026 Date of decision: 27.08.2026 M/S AASRA FOUNDATIONS (REGD.) AND ANOTHER ….Petitioners Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVINDRA SINGH CHAUHAN Present: - Mr. Rohit Suri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a supplementary reply to the show-cause notice issued by the respondent-Bank insofar as it pertains to the grievance raised in the present petition regarding the overlapping period of the Forensic Audit. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that he has no objection in case the petitioners file any such supplementary reply and in case any such supplementary reply is filed, the same will be considered in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the above, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition by giving the aforesaid liberty. POONAM RANI 2026.09.02 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- 4. Prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners is accepted. The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The petitioners may, in case, they so desire, file a supplementary reply to the show-cause notice issued by the respondent - Bank, especially when learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has stated that he has no objection in case any such supplementary reply is filed and in case any such supplementary reply is filed, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (PRAVINDRA SINGH CHAUHAN) 27.08.2026 JUDGE P. Seth i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No POONAM RANI 2026.09.02 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document