Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
31.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.79. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (A) 2833 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Harirampur Police Station case no. 242 of 2026 dated 22.06.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And In the matter of : Sakila Bibi & Anr.
……Petitioners. Ms. Jeenia Rudra Ms. Sukanya Banerjee
......for the Petitioners. Mr. Suman Agarwal Mr. Anirban Kumar Banerjee
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that there was a scuffle pursuant to which the petitioners have been implicated in the present case. Learned advocate appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. I have taken into account the injury report wherein doctor has opined that the injuries to be simple. In view of the aforesaid the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners namely, (1) Sakila Bibi and (2) Kabiluddin Ahmed is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal
2 Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the petitioners are entering regularly into disputes which are escalated in the locality, petitioners are directed to stay outside the jurisdiction of Harirampur Police Station till the investigation is over except for the purposes for attending the investigating officer of the case. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner no.2 shall report to the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days and thereafter, on all subsequent dates fixed by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Court. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 2833 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)