Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37121 (PNJ)

AMIT JINDAL v. UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRA-D/164/2014 · 2026-08-26

Puja Chopra, Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

105+307 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-35392-2026 in/and CRA-D-164-DB-2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.08.2026 Amit Jindal ...Appellant Vs. U.T. Chandigarh & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PUJA CHOPRA Present :- Mr. Manish Dadwal, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr. J.S. Toor, Senior Advocate with Mr. Adhiraj Toor, Advocate for the respondent-U.T., Chandigarh. ***** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) CRM-35392-2026 Prayer in the present application is for impleading legal representatives of deceased applicant/appellant namely Amit Jindal. Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that the applicant/appellant namely Amit Jindal has expired in the present case and thus prays to implead his legal representatives as mentioned in para No.3 of the application and for permitting Sh. Bhagwan Dass Jindal, father of deceased Amit Jindal to prosecute the present appeal on behalf of the legal representatives. In view of the above, present application is allowed and amended memo of party is taken on record. CRA-D-164-DB-2014 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant namely Amit TARSEM CHAUDHARY 2026.08.31 18:56 I am approving this document CRM-35392-2026 in/and CRA-D-164-DB-2014 (O&M) -2- Jindal challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 20.12.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Chandigarh, whereby the accused/respondents have been acquitted under Section 302 of IPC. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that newly impleaded legal representative namely Bhagwan Dass Jindal, who is father of the deceased applicant/appellant namely Amit Jindal does not want to pursue the present appeal further and thus prays for withdrawal of the same. 3. In view of the above, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, the LR’s of the appellant would be at liberty to avail their remedy under the law, if any further cause of action accrues. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE (PUJA CHOPRA) August 26, 2026 JUDGE Tarsem Chaudhary Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No TARSEM CHAUDHARY 2026.08.31 18:56 I am approving this document