CRM-M-47048-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CRM-M-47048-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 Randhir Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present : Ms. Samiksha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab. N.S.SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 99 dated 22.04.2026, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 3(5), 351(2), 117(2) and 118(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Sections 323, 324, 34, 506, 325 and 326 IPC), at Police Station Uchana, District Jind. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the present case and no specific AMIT RANA 2026.08.27 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-47048-2026 -2- role has been attributed to him. Further, the petitioner was arrested on 24th June 2026 and after completion of investigation, challan has already been presented against him. She further submits that in the present case Balraj, injured, has already been discharged from the hospital and is hale and hearty. As per her, the injured had suffered six injuries and only three injuries have been declared to be grievous in nature and the rest of the injuries are simple. The prosecution has cited 17 witnesses in the present case, but no witness has been examined so far. Thus, the conclusion of the trial may take quite a long time. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that there are serious allegations against the petitioner and the petitioner is not entitled for the concession of regular bail. Learned State counsel submits that there is one more case against the petitioner but the petitioner has already been granted the concession of bail in the said case. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. In the present case, the petitioner is stated to be in custody for the last more than two months and no witness has been examined so far. Thus, conclusion of the trial may take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner will not serve any useful purpose. AMIT RANA 2026.08.27 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-47048-2026 -3- 6. In view of the above, without commenting any further on the merits, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate/CJM concerned. 27.08.2026 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) amit rana JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AMIT RANA 2026.08.27 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document